Change Makes Change

Put your change to work!


Healthcare NOT Warfare

Join the “Healthcare NOT Warfare” campaign!


Site Search


PDA Site   Web
Search provided by Google®


Find Chapters


CD Point People

Find yours here.


Podcasts & Videos

Hear PDA podcasts.

PDA 2006 Election Video
» 56K modem   » broadband

Stop Funding War Video
» All formats


Action Alerts

Take action now!


Edwards is the only progressive candidate who can win the presidency

By Bryan Buchan, PDA Greater Phoenix chapter member
June 28, 2007, Phoenix, AZ

This is the second in an ongoing series of articles on the Edwards and Kucinich campaigns.


In my progressive circle, people are split between Edwards and Kucinich, but when it comes to Hillary Clinton, everyone is in agreement–none of us want her to win the nomination. To a person, we feel a Clinton nomination would have the same effect on Republicans as Bush has had on Democrats. Republicans who have been inactive will all of a sudden get active and vote for her opponent, no matter who it is.

The progressive vote could swing this election to or away from Clinton, depending on whether or not we can come together and vote as a block.

Recent polling data is very favorable towards the populist candidate, John Edwards. A June 11-14 poll by Gallup matched the three leading announced Democratic presidential candidates—Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards—against each of the three leading announced Republican candidates—Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, and Mitt Romney.

In a match-up of the three top Democratic candidates against Romney, Edwards wins with 61% of the vote, Obama follows with 57% of the vote, and Clinton gets 53% of the vote. Against McCain, the poll indicates Edwards garners 50% of the vote, with Clinton at 49% and Obama at 48%. When matched against Republican front-runner Guiliani, all three candidates score at 50%. All three of top tier candidates running for President can beat any of the top three Republican candidates, with Edwards leading the pack.

Other polling data among Democratic voters reveals that Clinton currently has a commanding lead. It is interesting that, although Edwards out performs the other two in a match up against Republicans, Clinton is seen more favorably by Democratic voters than the others. Why, heaven only knows, except she is terribly well funded by the corporatist DLC, and her corporate cronies.

While it is inarguable that Kucinich’s platform more closely aligns itself with PDA’s, Kucinich remains only a blip in voters’ minds, if at all. Edwards’ platform is still progressive and, if these polls are accurate, he is the best candidate Democrats can nominate if they hope to defeat whomever the Republican nominee turns out to be.

Fields of study are “devoted to examining” why citizens vote for candidates. Known as the “likeability quotient,” it appears that, more often than not, voters choose a candidate based on emotion rather than on the positions a candidate takes. This is unfortunate indeed, and it proves why the work of organizations like PDA is so important.

After the last six years, this election is shaping up to be something other than a discussion of positions. Many voters are disgruntled with the liberties this administration has taken with our Liberty, and they are looking for a candidate in whom they can put some trust and faith. As a progressive populist, Edwards has the qualities that reach across party lines and speak to our shared humanity.

These factors must be considered by progressives when choosing whom to back in the upcoming elections, or else the Democratic nominee will certainly be Hillary Clinton.

Please add your comments to our blog.